CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Postoperative pain incidence, assessment and its association with post transplant outcome in liver transplantation

Author: 
Victor W. Xia, M. A. Bakr, M. Abdelaziz, Ola. M. Wahba and Ahmed Abdelhafez
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Introduction Postoperative pain (POP) represents a major challenge in the management of surgical patients, as it is highly common after major surgeries and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. POP and its impact on patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood. Aim This study was undertaken to investigate the incidence, assessment of POP, and clinical outcomes of patients with high level of postoperative pain in LT. Materials and methods After IRB approval, adult LT patients between March 2013 and September 2015 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. All patients who were extubated in the first week following LT were included. Pain score (0 to 10) during the first seven days post-extubation was assessed by numerical rating scale and recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative low to moderate pain score (PLMPS) reported pain score from (0-6) and postoperative high pain score (PHPS) from (7-10). The two groups were compared using univariate analysis and independent risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression. Of 424 patients who underwent LT during this period, 272 were extubated within the first postoperative week and were included in the analysis. Results A total of 114 (41.9%) patients reported pain score at 7 or higher during 7 days following extubation and 158 patients (58.1%) reported pain score "between 0 to 6" during the same period. There were no significant differences regarding to age, gender, MELD score, surgery time, intraoperative blood transfusion, vasopressor use and renal replacement therapy between the PLMPS and PHPS groups. However, patients in the PHPS group had a higher dose of hydromorphone (6.2±7.1 vs. 3.4±4.3, p=0.001), oral morphine equivalent (233.9±302.7 vs 132.6±309.8, p=0.008), and longer hospital stay after LT compared with those in the PLMPS group (44.2±46.3 days vs 30.7± 26.6, p=0.006). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, PHPS was independent risk factor for prolonged (>30 days) hospital stay after LT (OR 2.0 95% CI 1.04-3.83, p=0.04). Other independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after LT include preoperative encephalopathy, renal replacement therapy, and graft failure. Conclusion PHPS was reported to affect 41.9% of adult LT patients. Patients with PHPS had high doses of hydromorphone, oral morphine equivalent andprolonged hospital stay after LT than patients with PLMPS. Out findings, highlight the importance of pain incidence, assessment and management after LT. Abbreviations: POP, postoperative pain; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; LT, liver transplantation; PHPS, postoperative high pain score; PLMPS, postoperative low to moderate pain score; OME, oral morphine equivalent; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran