CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

A comparative study of risk factors for graft failure in post penetrating keratoplasty in tertiary care hospital

Author: 
Dr. Vidya P Hiremath, Dr. Snehal Bonde Chaurasia and Dr. Sonali Tamboli
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background and Objective: Objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for corneal graft failure and isolate microrganisms associated with graft infections after penetrating keratoplasty . The present study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at tertiary care centre in central India. Methods: The present study was a case control study conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at tertiary eye care from November 2018 to October 2020. Patients operated for optical penetrating keratoplasty attending eye OPD were examined. Results: Preoperative risk factors- adjusted risk associated with donor’s age > 60 years was 8.798 with p-value 0.001, indicating significantly higher risk of graft failure as compared to donor’s age < 60 years. Presence of corneal vascularity had a significantly increased adjusted risk i.e. 7.542 with a p-value 0.002, as compared to those without corneal vascularity . Perioperative risk factors: the graft size > 8.5mm has significantly higher adjusted risk of graft failure with estimate of 15.296 with a p-value of 0.013, as compared to the reference category 8.0 – 8.5mm. Postoperative risk factors: The presence of raised IOP had significantly higher adjusted risk of graft failure with estimate 10.26 with a p-value 0.011, as compared to those with normal IOP. Adjusted risk estimate corresponding to epithelial defects was 8.464 with a p-value 0.014, suggesting increased risk as compared to those without the defect. The likelihood of graft failure corresponding to graft rejection was also significantly higher as indicated by adjusted estimate of 5.688 (95% CI: 1.048 – 30.869) with a p-value 0.044, compared to those with no graft rejection. Interpretation and conclusion: Pre-operative risk factors for graft failure: 2 or more quadrant corneal vascularisation, peripheral anterior synechiae and older donor age (>60 years). Peri-operative risk factors: repeat keratoplasty and larger donor graft size >8.5mm. Post operative risk factors: elevated IOP, suture problem, epithelial defect, graft rejection, post penetrating keratoplasty infection were postoperative risk factors for graft failure. As per multiple logistic regression Pre-operative risk factors were Corneal vascularization and Donor age of >60 years Peri-operative risk factors were Graft size of >8.5mm Post operative risk factors were raised IOP, epithelial defect, graft rejection. Although other factors indicated increased risk in univariate analysis, evidence was statistically insignificant in multivariate analysis.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran