CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Left ventricular shape& size based contractility index (lvsci), for effectively (i) designating normal well-contracting left ventricles, and (ii) depicting cardiomyopathic left ventricles and risk of heart failure

Author: 
Dhanjoo N. Ghista, Vinithasree Subbhuraam and Vidya K Sudarshan
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

The heart’s left ventricle (LV) has an intrinsically optimal ellipsoidal shape that efficiently contributes to its contractility. We start with this below figure,depicting the LV simulating geometrical model, as a prolate ellipsoid truncated 50% of the distance from equator to base. Based on this figure, we define:

LV shape factor: S = SA/LA (1)

Figure. LV ellipsoidal model geometry: SA = AP/2 and LA = BA/1.5, where AP and BA are the major and minor axes of the LV ellipsoid.

The values of SA and LA can be determined from the echocardiographic monitored values of the LV volume (V) and myocardium volume (VM), given by: VM = 9 π [2 LA x SA² + SA²]h/8 (2) V = 9 π SA² LA/8 (3) wherein V is LV volume, VM is myocardial volume, h is wall-thickness, LA and SA are endocardial major and minor radii. We then define V*= VM /V. Based on the left ventricular ellipsoidal shell model, we can express the circumferential pressure-normalized LV wall stress * (= /P), at the waist of the LV ellipsoidal model, as: (4) This equation provides *as a function of shape factor S, for a given V*. Then the LV contractility index is given by d*/dtmaxwhich is a function of both S and V* (= VM /V). We can thereby employ this LV contractility index which is also shown to be closely related to the conventional contractility index dP/dtmax. Now, based on the 3-d reconstructed surface images of normal LV and ischemic cardiomyopathic (ICM) LV, we have noted that a normal LV is more ellipsoidal in shape compared to the ICM LV. We have also noted that (i) the normal LV becomes more ellipsoidal from end-diastole (ED) to end-systole (ES)with greater reduction in shape factor (S), and (ii) also smaller in size (i.e. greater decrease V and hence greater increase in V*, compared to the ICM LV. In other words, the shape & size factor (S/ V*) decreases far more from the start of ejection (se) to the end of ejection (ee) in the normal LV compared to the ICM LV. So, then based on all these findings, we can now define a simplistic and yet very effective LV Shape &Size Factor-based nondimensional Contractility Index (LVSCI): LVSCI = [(S/ V*)se - (S/ V*)ee ]/ (S/ V*)se x 100 % (5) where se denotes start of ejection and ee denotes end of ejection. Based on thclinical studies data, it is shown that (i) for Group 1 with normal contractility, LVSCI = 70 and the traditional contractility indexdP/dtmax= 1406 mmHg/s, whereas (ii) for Group 3, with poor contractility LVSCI = 47 and dP/dtmax= 948 mmHg/s. This represents a big testimony of the validity and novelty of our LV shape & size based nondimensional contractility Index LVSCI. which can be totally based on LV echocardiographic imaging of LV volume and its myocardial volume only.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran